These can be thought of as the supporting pillars of Situation Ethics, resting upon a foundation of the four presumptions indicated above. Value is only added to something when it is useful to love working for the sake of persons. Antinomianism—The way of making moral decisions in which any governing rules or laws are non-existent; anarchic.
Hire Writer He believed that this was too rigid, and that it did not allow for exceptions. The opposite of Antinomianism. Paul which is the commandment to love and as Fletcher is a Christian as is JAT Robinson it shows that doing the most loving thing won't cause any harm as love is harmless and looks for the best interests in every human.
The Thoughts of Blaise Pascal. The state of each country has set up certain rules in order to have justice served, in the UK if you murder someone you face the charges that the law has given and if important rules like do not murder are broken this results in a unjust society and extremely dangerous society.
These rules were necessary to keep order in the world, as many would argue that without rules we would descend into moral chaos. This concept affirms that there is an absolute, objective standard of right and wrong grounded in the holy nature of God himselfand this code of moral conduct is set forth in the Bible—reaching its zenith in the New Testament.
Agape love—For Situationist Christians this is the unconditional, non-reciprocal love that governs their moral decisions. However someone following the guidelines of Situation Ethics may be able to grant the patient their wish, if it was the most loving thing to do in that situation.
Ultimately, every man is his own judge of the matter. The Agapeistic Calculus is simple and straightforward to employ, as opposed to the Hedonic Calculus of Utilitarianism as proposed by Jeremy Bentham. If this dogma is true, the martyrs died in vain.
There are no rules—absolutely none—for human conduct; according to this ideology, every person is a law unto himself.
Certain Pharisees saw this, and charged these men with breaking the sabbath regulation within the Mosaic law. If you have to break in to someone's house to save a loving one then it is right to do so.
Legalism—The way of making moral decisions in which rules and laws take priority. Fletcher attempts to reconcile the church with society on a practical level by suggesting that — when making moral decisions — one should consult tradition, but be prepared to set it aside for the sake of agape love.
A married man, with whom she works, decides to have an affair with her in order to comfort her.
Another devastating attack on Situation ethics is the argument that love is subjective; that it means something different to every individual. If love is the only rule then there is a huge loss in protection.
Fletcher claims that Situation Ethics is exactly this, for it is easy to apply in a moral dilemma. For example, Roman Catholics deduce their morality from Natural Moral Law, and believe in the sanctity of life where life is sacred and must be preserved. This absolutist view would not put the law aside in a particular circumstance, as does the Situationist, and therefore it is too rigid to be pragmatic.
Without these, the ethical theory would not be able to function. One of the key strengths of Situation Ethic is the fact that it is flexible, meaning that an action can change depending on the situation of those involved even if it is the same situation.
It is not emotional or passionate, but is a means of doing good to others, driven by the will. For example, one person may consider acting to save the life of a loved one to be the most loving thing, whereas another may think that euthanasia could be acting for the greatest love.
The case of Rahab does not bestow divine sanction upon the practice of situation ethics. If Jesus acted as a situationist might and Christians must follow his example, then the two can be reconciled. It searches for the most loving action towards that person by promoting their best interests.
If love is the only rule then there is a huge loss in protection. Free Essay: Situation Ethics An Anglican theologian Joseph Fletcher developed situation Ethics.
Legalism is the idea that there are fixed moral laws which. Florence nightingale contribution essay, making a thesis statement for an argumentative essay on the death money minded people essay cross referencing dissertation, january global regents essay review global climate change short essay on global warming, group 1 mains essays on poverty heilker essay about myself ontological argument anselm essay about myself cause and effect essay videos.
Situation ethics is a teleological, relative ethical theory which is based on love. The theory uses motive and states that any rules can be bended if love is best served.
Situation ethics is most commonly assioated with philosopher such as Jopseph Fletcher USA and JAT Robinson UK who developed it. This first essay is clearly expressed and, at first, gets the main points about situation ethics mostly correct. It is to be credited for showing knowledge of various thinkers sympathetic to situation ethics.3/5.
- Situation Ethics An Anglican theologian Joseph Fletcher developed situation Ethics. Legalism is the idea that there are fixed moral laws which are to be obeyed at all times.
Antinomianism is the idea that there are no fixed moral principles but that one acts morally spontaneously.
3/5 This first essay is clearly expressed and, at first, gets the main points about situation ethics mostly correct. It is to be credited for showing knowledge of various thinkers sympathetic to situation ethics.3/5.Situation ethics essay